![]() I have noted that you can simulate many things by placing multiple pads on the same spot with the same pin number, but its not the same. The lack of pad stack support make it very complicated to make more advanced feature. When you place a symbol in the schematic Altium automatically creates fields in the symbol corresponding to values i database like manufacturer’s part number etc.ĭue to the missing information in the KiCad library symbol (see above) the the generated BOMs are very limited that require a lot of reverse engineering.Ĭreating pads and vias is a mess. We store all component info in externa database or even Excelsheet. Its basically a bus you can build with arbitrary net names and sub busses. KiCad Version: (5.99.0-8185-g86be755c83), release buildĪltium have an excellent feature called Harness. ![]() Here is what I found missing in KiCad 5.99 to make it decent replacement to Altium. A smaller project specially if you stay out of BGAs and QFNs/SONs KiCad will do the work pretty much the same. And I think the routing function in many ways are superior to Altium. The last week I have tried to do complete design in KiCad (just not playing around) to see what it’s capable of. Since 20+ years Altium is first go to software. I have used many of the PCB / EDA software’s on the market. I am professional developer with 30+ years experience.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |